Unaccusative & unergative
adapted from a 20 Dec 96 post by Jim Grossman
Also, could someone on this list provide reasonably
authoritative definitions of "unaccusative verb" and "unergative
verb," with examples to illustrate the concepts?
Mark Line wrote:
I'm not sure I'd be likely to use these terms -- maybe somebody has used
them to describe phenomena in a specific language. Where did you run
across them?
The terms "unaccusative" and "unergative" appeared on the list
before, but when I went over what I had saved about them, I
realized I needed clearer information.
After I queried the list about them, I found something called
"The Lexicon of Linguistics" on the web, and looked the terms
up there. Frankly, there's a lot in the entries that I don't
understand; but I get the basic ideas well enough so that I
can use them in the artlang I'm working on now. Since the
"Lexicon" was not written by God, I would naturally be
interested in any informed comments about the entries.
Copied from "The Lexicon of Linguistics" on the Web:
Note: I'd love to have a link to this site, please mail me if you can find it.
- Unaccusative verb
-
Special kind of °intransitive verb. Semantically, its subject does not
actively initiate or is not actively responsible for the action of the verb;
rather, it has properties which it shares with the direct object of a
transitive verb (or better, with the grammatical subject of its passive
counterpart).
EXAMPLE: in English arrive, die and fall are unaccusative verbs.
- Ergative verb.
- SYNTAX: verb that assigns no °external theta-role and no structural °Case.
Its argument is in object position at D-structure, but has to move to
subject position in order to receive (nominative) Case (from INFL). The
syntactic behaviour of unaccusatives differs in various ways from
non-unaccusative intransitive verbs (°unergatives). In languages that have
a distinction between the perfective auxiliaries 'to be' and 'to have', the
unaccusatives take 'to be', while the unergatives take 'to have'. EXAMPLE:
the Italian sentences in (1) and the Dutch sentences in (2) are examples.
- a telefonato Gianni
has telephoned G
- è arrivato Claudio
is arrived C
- Jan heeft getelefoneerd
J has telephoned
- Klaas is gearriveerd
K has arrived
Furthermore, unaccusatives cannot be passivized, as opposed to unergatives
(in languages with impersonal passives). This is shown by the contrast
between the Dutch (3) and (4).
- er wordt door Jan getelefoneerd
there is by J telephoned
- *er wordt door Klaas gearriveerd
there is by K arrived
In Italian, a further diagnostic to distinguish unaccusatives from
unergatives is the possibility of ne-cliticization. LIT. Perlmutter
(1978), Perlmutter & Postal (1984), Burzio (1981, 1986), Belleti & Rizzi
(1981), Den Besten (1985), Hoekstra (1988), Grewendorf (1987). - Unergative verb
- Special kind of °intransitive verb. Semantically, unergative verbs have a
subject perceived as actively initiating or actively responsible for the
action expressed by the verb.
EXAMPLE: in English run, talk and resign are
unergative verbs. In syntax, unergative verbs are characterized as verbs with
an °external argument. See °unaccusative verb. LIT. Perlmutter & Postal
(1984), Burzio (1986).
Return to Conlang-related topics|Back to FAQ page
Copyright © 1997, Jack Durst,
Last updated: 7 Jul, 1997