The Conlang FAQ

Ergative

adapted from April 12-13, 1997 posts by Clinton Moreland, David E. Bell, and Mark P. Line

On Sat, 12 Apr 1997, Alfredo Reino wrote:

Is there any kind soul in the house who would explain in five lines what it is to be an "ergative" language?

[Clinton Moreland]

An ergative language is one that marks the agent/subject of intransitive verbs the same way in which it marks the patient/object of transitive ones. For example...

Where -yan is the ergative ending. Did I get this right, the rest of you? Or have I forgotten already?

[David E. Bell]

In 5 lines more or less. An ergative language is one where there is a formal parallel between the object of a transitive verb and the subject of an intransitive verb (usually displaying the same case). This is generally in opposition to Nom/Acc languages which express a relationship between the subjects of both transitive and intransitive sentences. Thus:


[Mark P. Line]

The rationale behind the ergative/absolutive system is perhaps more obvious in such examples as these:

  1. the man-ERG opened the door-ABSOL
    the door-ABSOL opened
  2. the robber-ERG killed the shopkeeper-ABSOL
    the shopkeeper-ABSOL died
  3. Tommy-ERG plays that_pinball_machine-ABSOL well
    that_pinball_machine-ABSOL plays well
  4. I-ERG am cleaning the bedroom carpet-ABSOL
    the bedroom carpet-ABSOL cleans well

Return to Conlang-related topics|Back to FAQ page

Copyright © 1997, Paul M. Hoffman,
Last updated: July 20, 1997